Do you think that adopting the theoretical perspective(s) from this section would help to give us a better understanding of a different field?

Paper instructions Below you will find some questions to help guide you in your second section essay. Remember, the essay functions as both a personal reflection and an analysis on the material covere

Paper instructionsBelow you will find some questions to help guide you in your second section essay. Remember, the essay functions as both a personal reflection and an analysis on the material covered. The idea is to demonstrate that you have understood important aspects of the material. There is not any one particular way to approach the assignment beyond making sure that it is coherent (meaning in essay format), relates to the readings for the week, and should be, at a minimum, four pages in length.Potential Ideas for Section Essay #21. Underlying Marx’s critique of the capitalist mode of production, we find some assumptions (some of which are explicit- think “species-being”) about human nature. After reading through his work, do you agree or disagree with his depiction of a “human”? Is alienation possible and if so, is it a universal experience? Why or why not?2. Marx’s ideas have experienced a bit of a renaissance after the end of the Cold War, especially in the context of the global economic crisis (see this article here) . There have been an explosion in publications with titles like “Why Marx was Right”, which attempt to view our current economic problems through the lenses of Marx’s critique. After reading some of his work, do you think Marx’s ideas and theories are still relevant today?3. Marx argued that the ideas of the ruling class are the ideas of society, a notion that potentially runs against Durkheim’s notion of “collective consciousness.” Which perspective do you think is more valuable for explaining dominant beliefs? Are the two perspectives compatible? Why or why not?4. Bourdieu’s distinctions between different types of capital highlight the ways in which we often view our lives in economic terms, but are also frequently limited by that view. Which perspective do you find the most compelling or powerful: that of the economic view, or that of the social? What role has social and cultural capital played in your life? Is it something you’ve considered in the past? Do you find that Bourdieu’s explanation provides insight into your own personal experiences? Why or why not?If none of the ideas above strike your fancy and you are having difficulty determining what to write about, consider the following:1. Was there something important in the reading/theoretical position that you strongly disagree with? If so, that disagreement may be a suitable topic for the essay.2. Do you think the theory(s) proposed by Marx or Bourdieu have continued or contemporary relevance? If so, how might that be demonstrated? If not, what evidence do you have to support your argument? Either position might be a suitable topic for the essay.3. Did you find one reading more compelling than the others? Why is that? Perhaps you should direct your focus of the essay to that specific reading.4. Have you identified any inconsistencies in the readings which may influence the value of the ideas within? If so, what are they and what implications do these inconsistencies have? This may also serve as the basis for the essay.5. Do you have an alternative explanation for any of the theories posed? If so, what is it? How would you defend your own theory?6. Do you think that adopting the theoretical perspective(s) from this section would help to give us a better understanding of a different field? For instance, does Marx’s theory of alienation and production give us a new way to look at mental health? Does Bourdieu’s theories regarding the taste and social class help us to understand the problems of gender in the workplace (e.g. the glass ceiling; unequal pay)?