KINDS OF POP CULTURE

HU 340 Herzing University Online Wk 6 Pop Culture Infographic

HU 340

Herzing University Online

HU

Question Description

 

Unit 6 Assessment – Kinds of Pop Culture

  • Due Sunday by 11:59pm
  • Points 85
  • Submitting a text entry box or a file upload

Instructions

Develop: Infographic or Timeline

EVALUATION TITLE: KINDS OF POP CULTURE

As media grows and changes, we incorporate the new forms of communications into popular culture. However, the previous communication methods continue to be used as well.

Your assignment this week has two parts: First, you will create a timeline or infographic to address the following questions:

  1. Research and provide examples or comparisons that demonstrate these changes over time from each of the categories: Print, Radio/Music, Cinema, Television, and the Internet. Include images of each artifact.
  2. How have these various forms of communication have evolved since they were first introduced? (Give a “before” and “after”)

Second, you will write a mini-statement answering the following question.

  1. In 300-500 words, give your opinion: Will pop culture ever stop using a form of media? Why or why not?

Specifications:

You will submit an Infographic or timeline in response to part 1 with an accompanying mini-statement to address part 2. Your infographic can be submitted as MS Word document or if you use an online infographic creator like the ones listed below you can submit your infographic as a URL. Your accompanying mini-statement can be included on your infographic or submitted separately as an MS Word document.

Helpful tips:

Estimated time to complete: 4 hours

Rubric

Unit 6 Assessment – Kinds of Pop Culture

Unit 6 Assessment – Kinds of Pop Culture
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentHU340-CO1; HU340-CO2
27.0 ptsLevel 5

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner.

24.0 ptsLevel 4

Expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with minor weaknesses in one or more of the areas.

22.0 ptsLevel 3

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Expresses ideas in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and culturally respectful manner with weaknesses in these area.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Partially expresses content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are partially expressed in an organized, professional, and culturally respectful manner with major weaknesses in these areas.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Expresses limited content knowledge with the assignment purpose. Ideas are not expressed in a complete, organized, clear, professional, and/or culturally respectful manner.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there are no constructed concepts that demonstrate analytically skills and no evidences to support the content does not align to the assignment instructions

27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysisPRICE-P
27.0 ptsLevel 5

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with strong evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

24.0 ptsLevel 4

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating strong analytical skills with evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

22.0 ptsLevel 3

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating analytical skills with some evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

19.0 ptsLevel 2

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating weak analytical skills with minimal evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

16.0 ptsLevel 1

Constructs concepts related to course content, demonstrating inadequate evidence of analytical skills. There is minimal or no evidence to support professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or there was no evidence of constructed concepts that are supported by professional and personal subject knowledge through details, supporting evidence, and idea differentiation.

27.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeTechnology
15.0 ptsLevel 5

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement all assignment requirements.

14.0 ptsLevel 4

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement most assignment requirements.

12.0 ptsLevel 3

Manipulates multiple technological resources to effectively implement some assignment requirements.

11.0 ptsLevel 2

Manipulates multiple technological resources for some assignment requirements.

9.0 ptsLevel 1

Manipulates technological resources to minimally meet some assignment requirements.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment was not completed or difficulties with technological manipulation were evident. The assignment submitted does not meet requriements.

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting
10.0 ptsLevel 5

The assignment exhibits a excellent command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

6.0 ptsLevel 4

The assignment exhibits a good command of written English language conventions. The assignment has no errors in mechanics, or spelling with minor grammatical errors that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 ptsLevel 3

The assignment exhibits a basic command of written English language conventions. The assignment has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication

2.0 ptsLevel 2

The assignment exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The assignment has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

1.0 ptsLevel 1

The assignment exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The assignment has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 ptsLevel 0

The assignment does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The assignment has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPAPRICE-I
6.0 ptsLevel 5

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included with no errors.

5.0 ptsLevel 4

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 1-2 minor APA errors.

4.0 ptsLevel 3

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have 3 – 4 minor APA errors.

3.0 ptsLevel 2

In-text citations of sources and references in proper APA style are included but have more than 4 errors.

2.0 ptsLevel 1

The errors demonstrate limited understanding of in-text citation and reference requirements

0.0 ptsLevel 0

There are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

6.0 pts
Total Points: 85.0