System Design Scoring Guide

CYB- 690 System Design Scoring Guide

Performance Level Ratings

Meets Expectations Performance consistently met expectations in all essential areas of the assignment criteria, at times possibly exceeding expectations, and the quality of work overall was very good. The most critical goals were met.
Near Expectations Performance did not consistently meet expectations. Performance failed to meet expectations in one or more essential areas of the assignment criteria, one or more of the most critical goals were not met.
Below Expectations Performance was consistently below expectations in most essential areas of the assignment criteria, reasonable progress toward critical goals was not made. Significant improvement is needed in one or more important areas.
Criteria Below Expectations Near Expectations Meets Expectations Earned
The student comprehensively presents a system design document making sure to:
Describe the design goals and considerations. 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
Provide a high-level overview of the system architecture. 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
Describe the data design associated with the system. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
Describe the human-machine interface and operational scenarios. 0 pts – 6 pts 7 pts – 9 pts 10 pts
Design a drawing appropriate for implementation. The high-level system design should be further decomposed into low-level detailed design specifications for each system component, including hardware, internal communications, software, system integrity controls, and external interfaces. 0 pts – 9 pts 10 pts – 14 pts 15 pts
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures, figures of speech, and industry terminology. 0 pts – 2 pts 3 pts – 4 pts 5 pts
TOTAL /65
Instructor Feedback

© 2019. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.