What is the central argument made by both Schattschneider and Gilens/Page?
New York University
Question Description
Please respond briefly to each question and number your responses.
- How do members of Congress win reelection, per Fenno?
- Why Madison expect will participate in politics? Is his expectation correct? Why or why not?
- What is the pluralist model of representation in government?
- What is the central argument made by both Schattschneider and Gilens/Page?
- How do Schattschneider and Gilens/Page’s arguments offer a critique of pluralism?
Your response to this paper should be 200-400 words. You may upload a response as either a Word document or PDF.
READING MATERIALS:
Reader, Chapter 12: “Risk Bearing and Progressive Ambition” (by David Rohde)
Canes-Wrone, B. (2013). “From Mass Preferences to Policy.” Annual Review of Political Science, 18(1).
Reader, Chapter 6: “U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration” (by Richard Fenno)
Gilens, Martin & Benjamin Page. 2014. “Testing Theories of American Politics: Elites, Interest Groups, and Average Citizens.” Perspectives on Politics 12(3): 564-581.
selection from Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. “The Scope & Bias of the Pressure System” In The Semisovereign People: A Realist’s View of Democracy in America. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.